I’m quite a fan of the UK BBC TV series Top Gear. I’m not a massive “petrol head” yet I enjoy the show’s car-related features, celebrity banter, and the often humiliation of James May. So I sat down on Sunday night to watch the latest episode and the main feature for the show was based on McLaren’s new road car, called the P1.
If you haven’t seen this episode yet I implore you to watch it on BBC iPlayer (UK) or on YouTube:
Jeremy Clarkson was the lucky sod that was assigned (probably more like jumped at) the chance to review the P1 on the mean streets of Belgium. And he couldn’t stop coo’ing about it! I’ve littered this blog post with his quotes from the show…
“Now, what is the P1″ I hear you ask,” and what has it got to do with enterprise storage?!”
Well – the McLaren P1 is a HYBRID car; powered by Electric and Petrol (or Gas if you’re American), yet it produces 903 horsepower and can achieve 0-60mph in under 2.8 seconds…. and 0-120mph takes 6.8 seconds. In fact it hits 120 mph in the same time it takes a Golf GTI to hit 60 mph! It also can cruise around in electric-only mode should you wish, or happily sit on a motorway at 70-80 mph in hybrid mode and be economical. But when performance is required, it can adjust on the fly and deliver raw power to whatsoever needed.
“Oh, they should have called this the widowmaker!”
This is not the standard type of hybrid car you and I know. This is a redesigned-from-the-ground-up “hypercar” that uses electric technology to enhance the internal combustion engine performance whilst taking advantage of aerodynamics to force airflow for better centre of gravity whilst going at various speeds… so using new technology as an enhancement to legacy, well known gear to produce something phenomenal.
“This is partly because it’s made of stuff from the future, and partly because it’s clever; it adapts and moves around on demand to suit it’s environment.”
Of course the key to all of this is “redesign.” If McLaren (or indeed Ford, VW, GM etc) were to try and do this to any of their current flock of road cars they sell today it would frankly fail, mostly because they are based on the Internal Combustion Engine alone would not have the ability to harness the great things of electric in the best way possible. This is what we in vendor land call “bolt-on solutions;” someone offering a hot piece of tech on top of their legacy systems in order to try and capture some of the market.
This whole analogy is a very familiar story that we at Nimble Storage have been saying for the last 3-4 years with enterprise storage. Current storage manufacturers are pushing their wares to customers based on legacy technology of disk, RAID sets, single-core CPUs, single threaded OSs, with high service cost to put it all together. These guys are the storage equivalent of selling the internal combustion engine — few tweaks can be made to the system for a bit more efficiency, but ultimately have engineering challenges that cannot overcome without a full redesign.
It’s also possible to go the storage equivalent of fully electric with flash-only arrays, who promise massive reductions in power and a ridiculous increases in performance. However those guys have the same challenges as electric cars — which are typically very early generation immature systems with few enterprise software features that we would expect on today’s gear at a relatively high cost to procure.
Everyone has different needs, of course, but I know I could not invest in an electric car to do 15,000 miles a year as I do today in my current diesel-based motor… although I may in 10-15 years when it makes more sense and becomes more cost effective, but I wouldn’t be willing to compromise on features I deem mandatory such as iPhone integration, sat nav, heated seats, cruise control, etc.
Full electric certainly has it’s use cases but they are very much a niche 1 percent of the market (mostly adopted by inner city taxi drivers I’ve observed, but I digress) which is why most manufacturers are not diving head first into releasing a full fleet of electric only models. And the same could be argued for flash-only systems in an enterprise environment for 99 percent of data storage requirements (regardless of what the very well put marketing says!).
Which leads us back to hybrid offerings of both cars and storage. These are offered from the legacy vendors as a bolt-on to their current platforms (think GM/IBM, Ford/Dell, VW/HP) or offered from companies such as McLaren/Nimble Storage with a redesigned-from-the-ground-up solution (with a brand new file system in our case!) which allows us to use the cool things around today (e.g. MLC Flash, lots of DRAM and NVRAM and multi-core Intel CPUs) to enhance our internal combustion engine (RAID 6 7.2K NL-SAS) but with some cool redesigned secret source called CASL to get the best of both worlds that our competitors cannot achieve — meaning you can potter about at 30 mph, cruise at 70 mph but if big demanding workloads come along at 200 mph we can easily deliver & cope with the requirements.
“…and what I find hysterical is that McLaren has taken this hybrid technology which is designed to reduce the impact of the internal combustion engine…. and is using it to INCREASE the impact. It’s like weaponising a wind farm.”
One area to break the comparison with the P1 is the features and functionality. The P1 was designed to be incredibly light and agile — Clarkson even stated it “was designed to be as fat as Iggy Pop”, which makes it economical and fast.
With Nimble we’ve managed to optimise ourselves to be as mind-blowingly fast as we need to be (60,000 IOPS is normally fast enough for most enterprise environments) but we’ve also built a robust enterprise feature set of data protection and application integration that most of the traditional vendors would be proud to have of. All wrapped up in our big-data analytics engine called Infosight for true cloud based, proactive monitoring and support.
“For years, cars have all been basically the same, but this really isn’t. It’s a game changer; genuinely a new chapter in the history of motoring.”
Could not have put it better myself.